Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Am. J. Epidemiol.
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lilienfeld, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lilienfeld, D. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 152, No. 1 : 4-9
Copyright © 2000 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


COMMENTARIES

John Snow: The First Hired Gun?

David E. Lilienfeld

From Bristol-Myers Squibb, HW 19-1.01, 313 Pennington-Rocky Hill Road, Pennington, NJ 08534.

ABSTRACT

The 1854 English cholera outbreak led to reform of Victorian public health legislation, including the Nuisances Removal and Diseases Prevention Act. The reforms threatened the closure of many factories whose fumes were considered hazardous to the public's health. The second witness to appear before the Parliamentary committee considering the reforms was Dr. John Snow. Snow testified on behalf of the manufacturers threatened by the reforms. He stated that the fumes from such establishments were not hazardous. He contended that the workers in these factories did not become ill as a result of their exposures, and therefore these fumes could not be a hazard to the general public's health. Snow also presented data from the 1854 cholera outbreak as the basis for his belief that epidemic diseases were transmitted by water, not air. Although the data concerned cholera, Snow extended the inference to all epidemic diseases. When the committee's report was published, The Lancet chastised Snow in a stinging editorial. Parliament subsequently revised the bill in favor of the manufacturers and passed it into law. The implications of this particular episode in the history of epidemiology are discussed.

epidemiology; cholera; history of medicine, 19th cent.; legislation; public health


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Am. J. Epidemiol.:

Invited Commentary: The Testimony of Dr. Snow
Jan P. Vandenbroucke
Am. J. Epidemiol. 2000 152: 10-12. [Extract] [FREE Full Text]  

John Snow and Modern-Day Environmental Epidemiology
Dale P. Sandler
Am. J. Epidemiol. 2000 152: 1-3. [Extract] [FREE Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
P. Moayyedi
Invited Commentary: Clues to the Etiology of Inflammatory Bowel Disease--A Return to John Snow?
Am. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2006; 164(7): 624 - 626.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
G. D. Smith
Commentary: Behind the Broad Street pump: aetiology, epidemiology and prevention of cholera in mid-19th century Britain
Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2002; 31(5): 920 - 932.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
D. P. Sandler
John Snow and Modern-Day Environmental Epidemiology
Am. J. Epidemiol., July 1, 2000; 152(1): 1 - 3.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. P. Vandenbroucke
Invited Commentary: The Testimony of Dr. Snow
Am. J. Epidemiol., July 1, 2000; 152(1): 10 - 12.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.