Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yano, E.
Right arrow Articles by Lan, Y.-J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yano, E.
Right arrow Articles by Lan, Y.-J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 154, No. 6 : 538-543
Copyright © 2001 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Cancer Mortality among Workers Exposed to Amphibole-free Chrysotile Asbestos

Eiji Yano1, Zhi-Ming Wang2, Xiao-Rong Wang1,2,3, Mian-Zheng Wang2 and Ya-Jia Lan2

1 Department of Hygiene and Public Health, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
2 Department of Occupational Medicine, West China University of Medical Sciences, Chengdu, China.
3 Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA.

The issue of whether exposure to chrysotile asbestos alone, without contamination from amphibole asbestos, causes lung cancer and mesothelioma was investigated in a 25-year longitudinal study (1972–1996) in Chongqin, China. The study cohort comprised 515 male asbestos plant workers exposed to chrysotile only; the control cohort included 650 non-dust-exposed workers. The results of analysis in which the proportional hazards model was used indicated that mortality due to all causes, all cancers, and lung cancer was related to asbestos exposure; the relative risks, adjusted for age and smoking, were 2.9, 4.3, and 6.6, respectively. Fiber concentrations in the raw material section and the textile section of the plant were 7.6 and 4.5 fibers/ml, respectively. Because of differences between the study and control plants, the authors also compared various sections of the asbestos plant that had different levels of dust exposure. The adjusted relative risk of lung cancer was 8.1 for workers exposed to high versus low levels of asbestos. Two cases of malignant mesothelioma, one pleural and the other peritoneal, were found in the asbestos cohort. These results suggest that heavy exposure to pure chrysotile asbestos alone, with negligible amphibole contamination, can cause lung cancer and malignant mesothelioma in exposed workers.

asbestos; longitudinal studies; lung neoplasms; mesothelioma; occupational exposure; smoking

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; RR, relative risk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
M. J Hein, L. T Stayner, E. Lehman, and J. M Dement
Follow-up study of chrysotile textile workers: cohort mortality and exposure-response
Occup. Environ. Med., September 1, 2007; 64(9): 616 - 625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
P Boffetta
Epidemiology of peritoneal mesothelioma: a review
Ann. Onc., June 1, 2007; 18(6): 985 - 990.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
P W J Bartrip
History of asbestos related disease
Postgrad. Med. J., February 1, 2004; 80(940): 72 - 76.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
H. D. Roach, G. J. Davies, R. Attanoos, M. Crane, H. Adams, and S. Phillips
Asbestos: When the Dust Settles—An Imaging Review of Asbestos-related Disease
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2002; 22(90001): S167 - 184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.