Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McMahon, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McMahon, A. D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 154, No. 6 : 557-562
Copyright © 2001 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Observation and Experiment with the Efficacy of Drugs: A Warning Example from a Cohort of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory and Ulcer-healing Drug Users

Alex D. McMahon

From the Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Boyd Orr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, Scotland (e-mail: alexm{at}stats.gla.ac.uk).

Observational data are well suited for many types of medical research, especially when randomized controlled trials are inappropriate. However, some researchers have attempted to justify routine use of observational data in situations in which randomized controlled trials are normally conducted. Literature searches cannot be used to directly compare the results of the two types of research, because invalid observational studies normally are not publishable in the journal literature. The author created a study (1989–1994) to determine the efficacy of one exposure (ulcer-healing drugs) in preventing the serious upper gastrointestinal toxicity associated with another exposure (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)). A cohort of subjects from Tayside, Scotland, receiving both NSAIDs and ulcer-healing drugs appeared to experience a large rise in their risk of gastric bleeding and perforation (e.g., the rate ratio was 10.00 (95% confidence interval: 6.68, 14.97) when this cohort was compared with one receiving NSAIDs alone). This increased risk was due to confounding. Thus, use of a "restricted cohort design" was not able to eliminate uncontrollable bias. It is possible that if many different studies were carried out, then observational research would be found to be only occasionally useful for studying drug efficacy.

anti-inflammatory agents; non-steroidal; cohort studies; drug evaluation; observation; pharmacoepidemiology; ulcer

Abbreviations: NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
P. J. S. Koo
Acute Pain Management
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, August 1, 2003; 16(4): 231 - 248.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.